www.Deceitful.info is brought to you by concerned citizens who believe when you have the truth you are better able to see the picture of what is happening to our state and country. We took great effort to keep opinions out of the picture and if there are any opinions or comments expressed they are clearly noted. In each of the items presented there are pieces of irrefutable evidence quoted and brought forth that those reading need to know about. All communications must be had through the Contact Page.


It doesn't take 1500 degrees to weaken steel

Construction of the WTC

Building 7 fell seven hours after the Twin Towers, posing as a perfect candidate for conspiracy theories. But Building 7 has several unique characteristics that very easily explain how and why it fell the way it did.

Con Theory #6 Building 7 was a controlled Demolition

  • Building 7 was built over a Electrical Substation which, in and of itself contains volatile chemicals capable of long burn time
  • There was a subway line that came through the WTC complex that exited the site through the basement of building 7 
  • The WTC site was a 14.6 acre hole 70 feet deep with a structural lid in it to form a surface at ground level, and when the towers fell into this hole that area became a bellows that would blow fire through and under Building 7
  • Also The conspiracy Theorists seem to always show 3 sides of Building 7 but never the side that was toward the North Tower. and that side of the building in it's entirety was absolutely devastated.
  • All the facts show that there was zero controlled demolition, including there was zero actual explosions that come even close to mimicking real Demolition explosions! 

WORLD TRADE CENTER 9/11 CONSPIRACY THEORIES

We have not found one conspiracy theorist who is promoting Controlled Demolition to be speaking 100% of the truth. NOT ONE!!


God has a saying in the bible, you can't find grapes on a thorn bush and you won't find figs on a thistle. Meaning if there is one lie from someone none of what they say is the truth.


So why would anyone lie about this or anything like it. Well how many scientists jumped on board with the lie of the climate change issue?? Why?? Follow the real money! NWO!


Well the WTC issue that should be explored and is avoided, is how did Clinton admin organize illegals to come into America and join with other muslims here, get the training to fly and let them slip under the radar during the first 8 months of the Bush Admin?

And what year did the muslims become the tool of choice by the NWO to take down America?

Is that why we see the promotion of the lie of WTC controlled demolition, to take the heat off the muslim connection and find a scapegoat to throw some innuendo at?

Also the video of the flight path of the plane hitting the pentagon was not a path that any missile would take.

So many questions, the truth of which scares the NWO colluders that for 18 years they have worked on tweaking the minds of Americans to busy to search the facts and a lot of time to manufacture fake scenarios.

Building 7 Conspiracy Theories

WTC 9/11 Politics

Conspiracy theories only works when people do not know or understand what is involved.

Con Theory #1 The buildings just  turned to dust

-Wrong: The 14.6 Acre,  WTC Building Site was excavated 70 feet deep giving massive space under ground level for the buildings to fall into and disappear.

Con Theory #2 The twin towers were a controlled demolition 

- Wrong: There was no noise of explosions and the puffs of dust seen as each floor collapses were due to the nature of the balloon type construction where each floor would act as a bellows.

Con Theory #3 Steel melts at 2700 degrees and fuel burns at 1500 therefore the planes could not have caused the collapse.

-Wrong: Heat weakens steel at a temperature lower than 1500 degrees, and in this weakened state, steel would be unable to support the weight of 20 stories above, and once the momentum started there is not any structural material that could have stopped the falling.

Con Theory #4 the buildings should have toppled instead of coming straight down

-Wrong: The Twin Towers were of unique design they were built like a tube with a stick down the middle on which the building would slide down. 

Con Theory #5 Because the twin towers were bigger they should have had a bigger impact on the seismographs than the Seattle Kingdom Controlled Demolition did.

-Wrong The fact that the seismograph shows a lesser impact than the Kingdom seems to prove no controlled demolition on any of the three buildings.

-And the manner in which the Twin Towers fell also would lessen the seismic impact.

Details of the construction of Twin Towers

Weakened steel will not hold up anything